Q&A - Converting to the Catholic Faith
Converting to the Catholic Faith
02.09.21
Question posted by “A.D.”
Hello everyone, this is my first
post. I hope to be charitable. If I say something that troubles someone, please
know, it isn’t on purpose. I am hear to learn and am quite ignorant on what
Catholicism teaches.
I am a Protestant, more
specificity, I am a southern baptist. I currently work as a chaplain at a
rescue mission to help men recover from drug and alcohol abuse.
I’ve thought about converting
many times over the last couple months. Catholicism has a lot that draws me....
architecture, a teaching magisterium, history, and infallibility. It is
scary to say that though because Converting would completely change my family
life and career though.
My question is this, how does
the Catholic Church know and establish its own infallibility? Is choosing to be
a catholic a fallible or infallible decision?
Finally, Is there an answer
to this question that is not circular and unique to Catholicism that
protestants cannot utilize as well.
P.S. - I read and watch a lot of
content by Trent Horn. If someone could explain to me where Dr. Sungenis
disagrees with Catholic Answers that would be great. Maybe even touch on the
Galileo issue? Is their difference of opinion there and does that matter in
regards to Christ wanting Catholics to be unified?
Responses by Laurence Gonzaga after each question.
1.
It is scary to say that though because
Converting would completely change my family life and career though.
a. Converting certainly changed all the lives of
the Biblical characters who converted to true faith as well. I would say it is
worth it, if it really is true, and you have come to that conclusion on your
own accord. There are plenty of books on conversion stories of Protestant
ministers who became Catholic, leaving a sure and secure career because they
know the treasure they found, is worth much more than the comfort and security
they leave behind. Check out:
i.
the Surprised by Truth books for
starters
ii.
the Coming Home Network
iii.
The Journey Home program on EWTN and
Youtube, etc.
2.
How does the Catholic Church know and
establish its own infallibility?
a.
I would first start with its own authority,
rather than infallibility, while it certainly is infallible. Christ established
a Church in Matthew 16:18, the “Rock” on which it was built upon was the Apostle
St. Peter, whose name, Kafa, Cephas, Petros, means “Rock”. The Church
pre-existed the Bible, because the New Testament books did not even begin to be
written until at least 20 years after the death of Christ. So, the Gospel was
preached as an oral tradition until then, and by epistle as they started to get
written, but the entire canon wasn’t established until centuries later.
Therefore, Christ establishes the authority of the Catholic Church. Look at:
i.
Not by Scripture Alone by Robert
Sungenis
ii.
Jesus, Peter, and the Keys by Scott
Butler et al.
iii.
The Biblical Basis for the Catholic Faith
by John Salza
iv.
The Biblical Basis for the Papacy
by John Salza
v.
The Biblical Basis for Tradition
by John Salza
vi.
By What Authority? by Mark Shea
3.
Is choosing to be a catholic a fallible
or infallible decision?
a.
All of man’s choices are fallible, and that
includes the choice to become Catholic.
4.
Is there an answer to this question that
is not circular and unique to Catholicism that protestants cannot utilize as
well.
a.
Even while man is fallible, he can still use
reason and logic to reason out the most rational conclusion he can and not just
remain where he is, out of convenience or some sense of fatalism that he can
never be sure of anything. The most important questions in apologetics, I think,
are the doctrines of the reformation, sola scriprura and sola fide. I would
suggest you listen to the two debates on this issue:
i.
Salvation and Scripture Debate on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHM7xVRdh5U
5.
If someone could explain to me where Dr.
Sungenis disagrees with Catholic Answers that would be great.
a.
Whether it is Dr. Sungenis, me, Catholic
Answers, or the most popular Catholic apologists out there yesterday, today,
and the future, we are all fallible with no authority in ourselves. So, the
differences in methods and content of our apologetics are not too important.
Ultimately, God is the one who will prepare your soul for the seeds of faith,
and the messenger is not as important as the message. There are points of
information that Dr. Sungenis may disagree on with various apologists out
there, but that’s not always a bad thing, as iron sharpens iron, and the
disagreements helps to sharpen Catholic apologetics in general.
6.
Maybe even touch on the Galileo issue?
a.
That is a long story. Catholic Answers has a
couple of books on the Galileo issue and geocentrism. Dr. Sungenis has several
books on geocentrism and one responding to the founder of Catholic Answers,
Karl Keating. In my opinion, this issue is of less importance than what’s
keeping you from the doors of the Catholic Church. Cross that threshold first,
and we can get into geocentrism later.
7.
Is their difference of opinion there and
does that matter in regards to Christ wanting Catholics to be unified?
a.
There is a saying, “in essentials unity, in
non-essentials diversity”. Some might say Biblical cosmology is a matter of
faith, and some say it is not. Dr. Sungenis would say it is a matter of faith,
and most other apologists would likely say it is not. That disagreement does
not negate the “unity” that is foundational to the principle of Catholic
universality.
In closing, if I may suggest, the most important questions that
need to be asked are the ones that continue to keep you from the Catholic
Church. Let’s look at those if you still have some.
God bless,
Laurence Gonzaga

Comments
Post a Comment