Towards tradism, not too much…

My first post on this blog was titled “Away from tradism”. It was intended to be a mild public statement of where I was at the time when that piece was written. Though even after re-reading it numerous times, I still believe it to be a rather sterile assessment of what I believed was lacking in the community with which I had once thought I felt was my home, theologically, socially, ecclesially, etc. I had numerous private discussions with certain individuals since then, which seemed to paint a picture of me as a churchy social drifter, one who does not take firm stands anymore, prideful, a judger, you name it. Those who have known me the longest since my reversion to the faith in 2002, you know who you are, can give testament to the minor changes I have gone through theologically. However, the social communities with which I attached myself to was a process. I wanted to find where my tendencies fit. In many ways, this is sort of like Protestantism. You have certain affinities, and you go church hopping. Except here, I went group hopping. I had my time with the teen ministries, the young adult ministries, a very brief visit with the charismatic groups, the traditionalists, the extreme traditionalists, and was on the verge of joining the extremely extreme traditionalists, and now where I find myself today; in no group at all. This development of my thought, belief, and practice has always been public. I don’t shun my former associations. They were instrumental in getting me to where I am today.

I recall a conversation with a friend who went down a list of all the former groups he was involved in, some of which I shared. He proceeded to assess all the faults and flaws of these groups and why they aren’t adequate. I asked him, to think about each group and to try to find at least one good thing each one of those groups instilled in his personality that made him a better person. If at least one can be found in each, honestly, then it was not a waste of time.

So, now I write this piece to bring the first piece back in mind. It was not to say I had abandoned tradition. I had abandoned the –ism. Close to a year ago, I was on the verge of giving up on traditionalism. I had become impatient, despairing, cynical, etc. That route changed when one particular individual came barging into my life. She had an idea that she wanted to share with me. So we had a meeting. She shared the idea and I thought it was a wonderful idea. It revolved around the practice of charity. In any case, she had convinced me that the answer was not to abandon the group, but to develop an apostolate therein. So that is where I am at today. My focus now is on the reformation of my own life, and helping others in the reformation of theirs. At first, it was spiritually, but as my interest in psychology resurfaced, now psychologically. In the days and weeks to come I have many ideas for writing projects. God willing, they will be written.

In life, we come across many people. We experience many things. We hear many stories and we make some of our own. We share our lives with others, and they share their lives with us. It is the human experience, and it is heartbreaking to know that most folks are not satisfied with their lives. Not everyday is a party, believe me, but we should strive to make each day as pleasant as can be. Let’s not waste our lives away. Be bold. Be useful. Be loving. 


May 21, 2011
Laurence G.

Comments

  1. Tt is somewhat good to hear you say these things. They don't sound very different, actually they sound like where you have been all along. I agree with disarming the segregation caused by the -ism. I also know that there are distinctions between people who follow tradition and those who follow a "new" theology. The distinctions are very clear. The only cynical people I know are the ones who sit in between and judge both sides: one as right and one as wrong, often both as wrong, and sometimes, strangely, and probably falsely both as right. Truth, whatever its position, is not an attribute of man, it belongs and is our Lord Himself. It does not sound like you are searching for truth, rather stability. Though I do not wish to judge. Stability is found not in the middle of a decision, but rather on one side or another, one group or another --for better AND worse. Psychologically speaking, it means belonging to a collective support system. Which brings the modern sense of security, which I think you would agree is false. More difficultly, spiritually it means throwing aside "my opinion" of things and adopting a different way of thinking. It is in the traditions of the RCC, it is historically clear, that the most security lies in the teaching of Christian life, as it is confirmed by the lives of countless apostles, martyrs, doctors, holy virgins, etc. To belong to any other, or to sit in the middle and judge is not the valid meaning of Virtus Stat in Medio. This OD theme is grossly misinterpreted. And, as it is clear, the church suffers still despite this widely held "humanistic" vision. The inability of leaders to take a side and do what is right has rocked the very foundations of the RCC. A proper understanding disarms anger and cynicism, but it does not negate tradition and the middle ground that it represents should not be mistaken for lukewarmness or tolerance. My dear friend Laurence, it is good that Our Lord has not yet removed our breath from within us to this moment. There remains in our life time. Time to not try to know the truth, but rather to know our lacking of it, and humbly submit ourselves to simplicity and obedience. It is only in humility that we know the wisdom of God. I would add that the SSPX is not a radical group, it is those who feel themselves empowered by being called "traditionalists" that are radical. This is not something to lord over others, rather it means a greater need to serve others, and preserve what is left. SSPX is simply a remnant of Catholic families struggling to maintain their faith. However, having been inside their schools and seen how good, healthy, innocent and prosperous the children. They would see the reality of what those bishops fight for. It is not some personal journey where "I" am in the center of reality. It is about Catholicism being in the center. It is about using the I to serve. After all the body rots and decays into dust, but what we do here on earth is all that remains in time. I mean the work. May God's grace inspire us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate your response. However, I suspect that either I was not clear in my presentation, or it has been misunderstood. The truth is in fact a Person, and that is Jesus Christ Himself. Truth is not Lifeteen, the "New Church", the "Novus Ordo", the Latin Mass, or the SSPX. We tend to associate with groups because it is where we find comfort to some degree or another. Nevertheless, I have to say I will disagre that I am not seeking the truth but seeking stability. Well, aren't we all? Stability does not exclude the possibility of truth. If this were not so, TLM groups would not seek regular offerings of the TLM everyday and holy day. If not, they would be just fine with 1st Sundays here, 2nd Sundays and 5th Sundays elsewhere, and 3rd and 4th Sundays at the English Mass. (Here us when I received your phone call :-))

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment